ABB 32011 has 5 recorded cross-reference matches across 5 manufacturers. Compare the listed alternatives and check their source notes before selecting a replacement.
Two-way recorded relationships. Each source may carry conditions or differences.
Blackburn L2502 versus ABB 32011:
Types L – Copper mechanical connectors, single conductor, two-hole mount. Confirm conductor material and size, conductor count, mounting geometry, torque requirements and applicable ratings before substitution.
Penn Union PNL-250-2 versus ABB 32011:
Types L – Copper mechanical connectors, single conductor, two-hole mount. Confirm conductor material and size, conductor count, mounting geometry, torque requirements and applicable ratings before substitution.
Burndy QA28-2B versus ABB 32011:
Types L – Copper mechanical connectors, single conductor, two-hole mount. Confirm conductor material and size, conductor count, mounting geometry, torque requirements and applicable ratings before substitution.
Ilsco/Utilco E-225 versus ABB 32011:
The manufacturer label Ilsco/Utilco is combined; the individual brand for this part has not been verified.
Types L – Copper mechanical connectors, single conductor, two-hole mount. Confirm conductor material and size, conductor count, mounting geometry, torque requirements and applicable ratings before substitution.
ABB 32011 versus Gedney SL242:
Types L – Copper mechanical connectors, single conductor, two-hole mount. Confirm conductor material and size, conductor count, mounting geometry, torque requirements and applicable ratings before substitution.
No part-specific datasheet link has been verified in this record. Catalog and document-search links are provided to help locate current specifications.
Counts describe recorded relationships, not stock, sales, testing or independent qualification. Manufacturer-and-part identities remain separate. Indexing dates do not establish current specifications or availability.
Check current manufacturer documents and electrical, mechanical, environmental and application requirements before selecting a replacement.
How ExactCross handles cross-reference data →