ABB 32013BD has 5 recorded cross-reference matches across 5 manufacturers. Compare the listed alternatives and check their source notes before selecting a replacement.
Two-way recorded relationships. Each source may carry conditions or differences.
Blackburn TL250 versus ABB 32013BD:
Types TL – Copper mechanical connectors, two conductors, two-hole mount. Confirm conductor material and size, conductor count, mounting geometry, torque requirements and applicable ratings before substitution.
Burndy Q2A31-2N versus ABB 32013BD:
Types TL – Copper mechanical connectors, two conductors, two-hole mount. Confirm conductor material and size, conductor count, mounting geometry, torque requirements and applicable ratings before substitution.
Ilsco/Utilco LU-4 versus ABB 32013BD:
The manufacturer label Ilsco/Utilco is combined; the individual brand for this part has not been verified.
Types TL – Copper mechanical connectors, two conductors, two-hole mount. Confirm conductor material and size, conductor count, mounting geometry, torque requirements and applicable ratings before substitution.
ABB 32013BD versus Dossert D2-25:
Types TL – Copper mechanical connectors, two conductors, two-hole mount. Confirm conductor material and size, conductor count, mounting geometry, torque requirements and applicable ratings before substitution.
ABB 32013BD versus Gedney SLL302:
Types TL – Copper mechanical connectors, two conductors, two-hole mount. Confirm conductor material and size, conductor count, mounting geometry, torque requirements and applicable ratings before substitution.
No part-specific datasheet link has been verified in this record. Catalog and document-search links are provided to help locate current specifications.
Counts describe recorded relationships, not stock, sales, testing or independent qualification. Manufacturer-and-part identities remain separate. Indexing dates do not establish current specifications or availability.
Check current manufacturer documents and electrical, mechanical, environmental and application requirements before selecting a replacement.
How ExactCross handles cross-reference data →