exactcross
PART CROSS REFERENCE · POWER & COMPRESSION CONNECTORS

CU250

Blackburn ↗

Blackburn CU250 has 10 recorded cross-reference matches across 10 manufacturers. Compare the listed alternatives and check their source notes before selecting a replacement.

10recorded matches
10alternate manufacturers
1reference sources
10matches with technical notes
COMPARE YOUR OPTIONS

CU250 equivalent products & cross references

Two-way recorded relationships. Each source may carry conditions or differences.

PENN UNION

BBCU-025

Technical notes
Technical notes

Blackburn CU250 versus Penn Union BBCU-025:

Type CU – Copper splices, long barrel. Confirm conductor material and size, hole count and spacing, barrel dimensions, compatible tooling/dies and applicable ratings before substitution.

Source: User provided
BURNDY

YS29

Technical notes
Technical notes

Blackburn CU250 versus Burndy YS29:

Type CU – Copper splices, long barrel. Confirm conductor material and size, hole count and spacing, barrel dimensions, compatible tooling/dies and applicable ratings before substitution.

Source: User provided
ILSCO

CTL-250

Technical notes
Technical notes

Blackburn CU250 versus Ilsco CTL-250:

Type CU – Copper splices, long barrel. Confirm conductor material and size, hole count and spacing, barrel dimensions, compatible tooling/dies and applicable ratings before substitution.

Source: User provided
Technical notes
Technical notes

Blackburn CU250 versus ABB 54813:

Type CU – Copper splices, long barrel. Confirm conductor material and size, hole count and spacing, barrel dimensions, compatible tooling/dies and applicable ratings before substitution.

Source: User provided
HOMAC

C250

Technical notes
Technical notes

Blackburn CU250 versus Homac C250:

Type CU – Copper splices, long barrel. Confirm conductor material and size, hole count and spacing, barrel dimensions, compatible tooling/dies and applicable ratings before substitution.

Source: User provided
KEARNEY

136700-250

Technical notes
Technical notes

Blackburn CU250 versus Kearney 136700-250:

Type CU – Copper splices, long barrel. Confirm conductor material and size, hole count and spacing, barrel dimensions, compatible tooling/dies and applicable ratings before substitution.

Source: User provided
ANDERSON

VHS-250

Technical notes
Technical notes

Blackburn CU250 versus Anderson VHS-250:

Type CU – Copper splices, long barrel. Confirm conductor material and size, hole count and spacing, barrel dimensions, compatible tooling/dies and applicable ratings before substitution.

Source: User provided
DOSSERT

DPC-25

Technical notes
Technical notes

Blackburn CU250 versus Dossert DPC-25:

Type CU – Copper splices, long barrel. Confirm conductor material and size, hole count and spacing, barrel dimensions, compatible tooling/dies and applicable ratings before substitution.

Source: User provided
PANDUIT

SCL250

Technical notes
Technical notes

Blackburn CU250 versus Panduit SCL250:

Type CU – Copper splices, long barrel. Confirm conductor material and size, hole count and spacing, barrel dimensions, compatible tooling/dies and applicable ratings before substitution.

Source: User provided
Technical notes
Technical notes

Blackburn CU250 versus 3M 11009:

Type CU – Copper splices, long barrel. Confirm conductor material and size, hole count and spacing, barrel dimensions, compatible tooling/dies and applicable ratings before substitution.

Source: User provided
MANUFACTURER DOCUMENTATION

Blackburn CU250 specifications & datasheets

No part-specific datasheet link has been verified in this record. Catalog and document-search links are provided to help locate current specifications.

TRACE THE REFERENCE

Source coverage & limitations

Counts describe recorded relationships, not stock, sales, testing or independent qualification. Manufacturer-and-part identities remain separate. Indexing dates do not establish current specifications or availability.

Check current manufacturer documents and electrical, mechanical, environmental and application requirements before selecting a replacement.

How ExactCross handles cross-reference data →