exactcross
PART CROSS REFERENCE · POWER & COMPRESSION CONNECTORS

136700-500

Kearney ↗

Kearney 136700-500 has 10 recorded cross-reference matches across 10 manufacturers. Compare the listed alternatives and check their source notes before selecting a replacement.

10recorded matches
10alternate manufacturers
1reference sources
10matches with technical notes
COMPARE YOUR OPTIONS

136700-500 equivalent products & cross references

Two-way recorded relationships. Each source may carry conditions or differences.

BLACKBURN

CU500

Technical notes
Technical notes

Blackburn CU500 versus Kearney 136700-500:

Type CU – Copper splices, long barrel. Confirm conductor material and size, hole count and spacing, barrel dimensions, compatible tooling/dies and applicable ratings before substitution.

Source: User provided
PENN UNION

BBCU-050

Technical notes
Technical notes

Penn Union BBCU-050 versus Kearney 136700-500:

Type CU – Copper splices, long barrel. Confirm conductor material and size, hole count and spacing, barrel dimensions, compatible tooling/dies and applicable ratings before substitution.

Source: User provided
BURNDY

YS34

Technical notes
Technical notes

Burndy YS34 versus Kearney 136700-500:

Type CU – Copper splices, long barrel. Confirm conductor material and size, hole count and spacing, barrel dimensions, compatible tooling/dies and applicable ratings before substitution.

Source: User provided
ILSCO

CTL-500

Technical notes
Technical notes

Ilsco CTL-500 versus Kearney 136700-500:

Type CU – Copper splices, long barrel. Confirm conductor material and size, hole count and spacing, barrel dimensions, compatible tooling/dies and applicable ratings before substitution.

Source: User provided
Technical notes
Technical notes

ABB 54818 versus Kearney 136700-500:

Type CU – Copper splices, long barrel. Confirm conductor material and size, hole count and spacing, barrel dimensions, compatible tooling/dies and applicable ratings before substitution.

Source: User provided
HOMAC

C500

Technical notes
Technical notes

Homac C500 versus Kearney 136700-500:

Type CU – Copper splices, long barrel. Confirm conductor material and size, hole count and spacing, barrel dimensions, compatible tooling/dies and applicable ratings before substitution.

Source: User provided
ANDERSON

VHS-500

Technical notes
Technical notes

Kearney 136700-500 versus Anderson VHS-500:

Type CU – Copper splices, long barrel. Confirm conductor material and size, hole count and spacing, barrel dimensions, compatible tooling/dies and applicable ratings before substitution.

Source: User provided
DOSSERT

DPC-50

Technical notes
Technical notes

Kearney 136700-500 versus Dossert DPC-50:

Type CU – Copper splices, long barrel. Confirm conductor material and size, hole count and spacing, barrel dimensions, compatible tooling/dies and applicable ratings before substitution.

Source: User provided
PANDUIT

SCL500

Technical notes
Technical notes

Kearney 136700-500 versus Panduit SCL500:

Type CU – Copper splices, long barrel. Confirm conductor material and size, hole count and spacing, barrel dimensions, compatible tooling/dies and applicable ratings before substitution.

Source: User provided
Technical notes
Technical notes

Kearney 136700-500 versus 3M 11014:

Type CU – Copper splices, long barrel. Confirm conductor material and size, hole count and spacing, barrel dimensions, compatible tooling/dies and applicable ratings before substitution.

Source: User provided
MANUFACTURER DOCUMENTATION

Kearney 136700-500 specifications & datasheets

No part-specific datasheet link has been verified in this record. Catalog and document-search links are provided to help locate current specifications.

TRACE THE REFERENCE

Source coverage & limitations

Counts describe recorded relationships, not stock, sales, testing or independent qualification. Manufacturer-and-part identities remain separate. Indexing dates do not establish current specifications or availability.

Check current manufacturer documents and electrical, mechanical, environmental and application requirements before selecting a replacement.

How ExactCross handles cross-reference data →